On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:15:42PM -0500, Dougherty, Joe wrote:

> Greetings:
> 
>       I'm slowly yanking out my hair over this one, and didn't see
> anything similar in the archives.
> 
>       I had a Linux box with iptables and 2.4.13, two external NICS. One
> talks to my internal net (192.168.1.0), the other to my internet network
> (1.1.1.0). On the inside network, I have a server (192.168.1.10) I want to
> make available through the firewall via ssh. 
>       On the external NIC, I set up a virtual address (1.1.1.100) as
> eth0:0. 
>       There are tables and rules that move the packets into the internal
> network and to the server. This has worked great for months (for http/https
> and ftp, too). 
>       Last week, I set up a new box that essentially identical to the
> first (only the hostnames and hardware are different). With a couple of
> exceptions, the iptables script on the new box sets up IDENTICALLY to the
> first. The ifconfig routine sets up the virtual address, and the host names
> all resolve properly on the external network. 

Can you access that internal machine from the firewall itself?

>       However, I cannot get ANY responses from the machine behind the
> firewall. My logs on the new firewall show a connection being made between
> the requesting systems and the system behind the firewall, but I get no
> response back from the internal machine. I've tried different virtual

Which is it then? a connection is being made _but_ you get no response back
from the internal machine? What does tcpdump say? What happens to the tcp
handshake?

> addresses, different requesting systems, and the target system refuses to

Again, can you connect to the internal machine from the firewall machine with
no iptables involvement?

Ramin

> reply. I even reverted back to kernel 2.4.13 from 2.4.17 on the new machine.
> I ran tcpdump and attempted to connect to see if there were any errors. I
> can see packets on the target machine, but nothing seems to get back to the
> other side.
>       When I switch things back to the old machine, it works fine.
> 
>       I'm really stumped on this. I'd like to get the new machine up as
> it's more powerful than the old box, but I cannot, for the life of me, see
> anything wrong here. Does anyone have suggestions as to where I might look
> that I haven't? 
> 
>       Thanks.
>       
> 
> Joe Dougherty
> Information Technology Systems Officer
> NAVLANTMETOCFAC Jacksonville
> (904) 542-2541 ext. 35 (comm)
> 942-2541 ext. 35 (DSN)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://www.nlmof.navy.mil
> 
> "rm -rf /bin/laden"
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to