And also, after searching bugtraq:

http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/254410
http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/254945
http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/255018

Short summary (taken from the second link):

"MSN Messenger communicates using UPNP to try to auto-detect any
UPNP-compliant firewalls/routers you may have.  Ostensibly, NAT/Firewall
devices that support UPNP will allow file transfers, voice and audio
communications so MSN Messenger polls for them to autoconfigure itself
and the NAT/Firewall device to support these transfer types."

/Christopher Thorjussen

>===== Original Message From "Ray Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =====
>off topic - but
>
>Steve Gibson, GRC.COM, has written an assembler language disabler of upnp.
>
>ray
>
>>===== Original Message From "James T. Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =====
>>Port 1900 is used by the SSDP (Simple Service Discovery Protocol )
>>Discovery Service in windows XP, ME and other windows operating
>>systems which implement universal plug and play. This service is used
>>to attach to plug and play network devices and services.
>>
>>Side note: I had set the the ssdp and upnp services to only run when
>>manually started on my client machine running windows XP. I recently
>>installed several updates from Microsoft for Internet Explorer and Msn
>>messenger and shortly noticed alot of connection atempts to port 1900
>>from my client machine to my linux gateway. Appearantly, one of these
>>updates starts/uses the SSDP service when the windows machine is
>>booted even if the service is set to only be started manually. To prevent
>>the service from running, the startup setting must be set to disabled.
>
>>Thanx for the answer. Both my WinXP laptop (which will go back to Win2k or
>>maybe RedHat) and my Win2k Pro workstation have started broadcasting these
>>SSDP announcements. So it's not only XP and ME, but also Win2k. You, as me,
>>have installed IE6 and MSN so this could probably be the reason for 
activating
>>this UPnP bullshit (at least for now, not seen anything using UPnP). I will
>>manually disable this feature thanks to James T. Moore's infomation. 
Hopefully
>>my log will yet again containt none Local Lan entries.


Reply via email to