On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:46:32AM -0800, Bob Balsover wrote: > Harold, > > I was under the impression that the h.323 code was in a beta sort of > state since it is a 'patch-o-matic'. Is my point of view on that sort of > thing incorrect?
it depends on your view of 'beta'. It seems to be quite robust and there are lots of succesful usage reports. The reason why it is in patch-o-matic is mainly a) because it depends on newnat (which will be standard with 2.4.20 and 2.5.8) b) because the way it implements NAT is not very clean (brute force) and something like this would never get into the kenel. > -Bob -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
