According to my reading of the iptables tutorial (linuxsecurity.com), it
only has a forward rule like this:  iptables -A FORWARD -i $LAN_IFACE -j
ACCEPT
The other forward rule allows ESTABLISHED,RELATED packets which I think
take care of return packets from servers:  iptables -A FORWARD -m state
--state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of doggy
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Forward Rule/nat
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
> 
> I want to know wheater it is possible to nat a packet from 
> the lan to the 
> internet without putting  a rule in the  forward chain.
> because always before I do a nat I need to do a forward rule 
> which allow to 
> forward the packet.
> 
> 
> 
> iptables -F
> iptables --table nat -F
> 
> iptables -P INPUT DROP
> iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
> iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> 
> #6665
> iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface ppp0 
> --protocol tcp 
> --source $LAN --destination !  $LAN --sport $HIGHPORTS 
> --dport 6665 -j 
> ACCEPT
> 
> 
> # Do I really need this rule ??
> # Or can a Attacker get with this rule into my lan with 
> source port 6665 ? iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface ppp0 
> --out-interface eth0 --protocol tcp 
> --source ! $LAN --destination  $LAN --sport 6665 --dport 
> $HIGHPORTS -j 
> ACCEPT
> 
> 
> iptables --table nat -A POSTROUTING --out-interface ppp0 
> --protocol tcp 
> --source $LAN --destination !  $LAN --sport $HIGHPORTS 
> --dport 6665 -j SNAT 
> --to $IFIP_ppp0
> 
> 
> Thanks for reading this and sorry for my bad english
> 
> 
> sebastian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to