Hi, On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:18:44AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:01:56PM -0500, Jeremy Gault wrote: > > What I'd like to do is to make the 486 (or whatever it ends up > > being) firewall become (mostly) invisible. Which would mean I need to > > have it bump up the TTL on packets by 1. I saw some examples, and none > > seem to work -- they produce the same error as this below.. > > you seem to lack support for one or more of > > - ip tables > - iptable_mangle > - ipt_ULOG > > in your kernel on freezeframe.
I can second this problem. > [root@bacchus /root]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j TTL > iptables v1.2.6-20020226: TTL: You must specify an action > Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. > [root@bacchus /root]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j TTL --ttl-inc 1 > iptables: No chain/target/match by that name iptables -t mangle -nvL also works (but all chains are empty). o Note that this is "1.2.6pre" (a snapshot from 20020226 with iptables-1.2.2-bug50990.patch applied, Eduardo Rogelio D�az <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> provided this bundled as src/i386 rpm at ftp://ftp.wsisiz.edu.pl/pub/Linux/rpms-7x/). o The kernel is 2.4.19-pre6-rmap12i-xfs-shawn11 without any netfilter patches applied. All the above modules are in place according to lsmod. furthermore anything related to iptables has been module enabled in the kernel config. I assume that it is a iptables-userland problem, so I would like to check this with a newer iptables bin. Are there any recent rpm specs floating around? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
