For both the routing-instance and routing-protocol, there is explicit support, via the “enabled” leaf, for retaining the respective information in the configuration but removing it from the operational state. This new functionality would be better provided with generic infra-structure to include or omit configuration rather than a mandatory leaf in introduced in these models. Those working on the IGP models (OSPF and IS-IS) reached consensus that “enabled" should be removed from the ietf-routing model and the IGPs will model the existing protocol administrative controls. Any objections?
Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
