Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we have an inconsistency in
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-05. With Y35, we allow type empty in
> unions. But section 7.8.2 says:
>
> A leaf that is part of the key can be of any built-in or derived
> type, except it MUST NOT be the built-in type "empty".
>
> This means that this is legal:
>
> typedef my-empty {
> type union {
> type empty;
> }
> }
>
> list foo {
> key id;
> leaf id {
> type my-empty;
> }
> ...
> }
>
>
> I suggest we allow type empty also in keys:
>
> NEW:
>
> A leaf that is part of the key can be of any built-in or derived
> type.
>
I support this.
Lada
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
