Regarding https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues/7
Jonathan> Why does 7(A) limit the scope to IETF-defined modules of
others are now defining YANG modules?
Benoit> Good point. We need to provide guidance for the other SDOs.
Current text says:
7. Ability for distinct modules to leverage a common model-structure
A. Scope is limited to IETF-defined modules
B. Multiple domain-specific trees are okay
C. Multiple namespaces are okay
Background:
I pulled 7A from Andy's message here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/I6clHE2665C40taRZHi0CKLD46U
and put a stake in the ground so that, if nothing else, it could
be discussed...and here we are!
FWIW, I wrote 7A this way because I didn't see how it can be
enforced outside of the IETF. But maybe that doesn't matter?
Of course, we can have 6087bis guidance for other SDOs, but
I didn't put that in the text.
Thoughts on how the text should be updated?
PS: Please Reply-All to the list rather than post comments to the GitHub
issue tracker.
Thanks,
Kent
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
