Regarding https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues/7
Jonathan> Why does 7(A) limit the scope to IETF-defined modules of others are now defining YANG modules? Benoit> Good point. We need to provide guidance for the other SDOs. Current text says: 7. Ability for distinct modules to leverage a common model-structure A. Scope is limited to IETF-defined modules B. Multiple domain-specific trees are okay C. Multiple namespaces are okay Background: I pulled 7A from Andy's message here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/I6clHE2665C40taRZHi0CKLD46U and put a stake in the ground so that, if nothing else, it could be discussed...and here we are! FWIW, I wrote 7A this way because I didn't see how it can be enforced outside of the IETF. But maybe that doesn't matter? Of course, we can have 6087bis guidance for other SDOs, but I didn't put that in the text. Thoughts on how the text should be updated? PS: Please Reply-All to the list rather than post comments to the GitHub issue tracker. Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod