Dean, et al, I have a few questions about the draft:
1. Does the following statement in the Section 7 IANA Consideration make "ietf-acl" equivalent to the long name "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"? urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list prefix: ietf-acl If the answer is YES, can the example in Section 4.3 can use "ietf-acl" directly instead of the long name? i.e. <access-lists "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-acl:1.0"> Does the "1" in ":1.0" above mean "yang-version 1" defined in the "module ietf-access-control-list"? what about the "0" a? 2. The beginning of the module has "prefix acl". Does it mean that "acl" is equivalent to "ietf-access-control-list"? <CODE BEGINS>file "[email protected]" module ietf-access-control-list { yang-version 1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"; prefix acl; 3. With "prefix acl" listed right after the "namespace", does the acl in "ietf-acl:acl" (in Appendix A.1) actually mean the whole name space? Thanks, Linda
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
