Dear all,
To extend on Dan's reply: Clearly, there is room for improvement!
The IETF 94 tutorial,
https://www.ietf.org/meeting/94/tutorials/yang-tutorial-hackathon.html,
which will explain how to use pyang, should be compulsory for everybody
posting a YANG model that doesn't compile. Actually, "must be
compulsory" :-)
The community has been building all the necessary tools:
- Martin Bjorklund posted pyang version 1.6. Get it from
https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang
- Carl Moberg built http://www.yangvalidator.com/
- Mahesh and I sent regular direct emails to draft authors, pointing to
the compilation errors from
http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
- The tools team (Henrik Levkowetz and Robert Sparks) will be
incorporating pyang directly in idnits by January.
- And more tools to come at this hackathon.
So no more excuses. At this point, most YANG modules must be compiling.
Regards, Benoit
COMPILATION PASSED/TOTAL ratio, sorry.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:32 AM
To: 'Benoit Claise'; NETMOD Working Group
Subject: RE: [netmod] And another peak of new YANG models just before
the submission deadline
The TOTAL/COMPILATION PASSED ratio seems to have improved since April
from ~25% to ~40%. This is good, but there is room for improvement.
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit
Claise
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:31 AM
To: NETMOD Working Group
Subject: [netmod] And another peak of new YANG models just before the
submission deadline
Dear all,
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
