Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated the YANG guidelines draft.
I have a couple of comments.
--------------------------
Section 5.14 says:
The "choice" statement is allowed to be directly present within a
"case" statement in YANG 1.1.
It is allowed in YANG 1 as well.
This needs to be considered
carefully. Consider simply including the nested "choice" as
additional "case" statements within the parent "choice" statement.
Ok, but I don't think people use nested choice by accident. I have
seen it used a handful of times, and there was always a good reason
for doing it. If you think some warning text like this is needed, I
suggest something along the lines of:
If a "case" statement contains a single "choice" statement,
consider simply including ...
--------------------------
Section 5.1 says:
Normative modules contained in Standards Track documents
MUST be named according to the guidelines in the IANA
Considerations section of [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis].
Note that since 6020bis doesn't obsolete 6020, the IANA Considerations
text is not copied to 6020bis. So either reference 6020, or copy the
rule (use "ietf-" prefix).
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
