Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The minutes for the two NETMOD sessions have been posted:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/minutes/minutes-94-netmod
>
> Please provide comments/corrections on these draft minutes by Wed, Nov 25th.
I got a comment based on the minutes that it seems like we are
suggesting that people should not use "choice" at all. I listened to
the recording, and I believe some crucial points were lost:
On page 7:
OLD:
[RS] if we want to simplify things, we need to remove choice completely.
[MB] L that is likely a good idea.
[RS] you need to track which branch gets used. It does not explicitly
does not show in the tree. And
for those who do not like they could not implement it.
[MB] maybe it is only applicable to very small trees only.
NEW:
[RS] if we want to simplify things, we need to remove choice
completely. I am not proposing that we do this.
[MB] I agree.
[RS] you need to track which branch gets used. It does not explicitly
show in the tree. And
for those who do not like they could not implement it.
[MB] The data model designer needs to use these constructs carefully.
"choice" is often used in very small trees only.
And to further clarify things, I do *not* think we should make this
"simplification". "choice" and "when" are both useful.
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
