> On 22 Dec 2015, at 12:38, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Jürgen, >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: >> >>> I hope that nobody disagrees that the operational state design and how >>> to structure the models are the two blocking factors to publish YANG >>> models. If you disagree or don't see this, let me know, I should >>> communicate better. >> Even if it may spoil your day, I disagree that there is a blocking >> factor that should stop us from publishing models. > Interestingly, I received that feedback again recently, this time from the > OSPF and ISIS YANG model authors.
Did they mention any reason *why* it is a blocking factor for their modules? Thanks, Lada >> There seem to be >> ways to address the requirements without having to block all work or >> to redo what that we have published. > That's my hope too. >> But sure, if you make it a >> blocking factor, it will be one. > I'll chose to ignore this last sentence. > > Regards, Benoit >> >>> I hope that nobody really believes that because some people in IETF (or >>> in any other SDOs) thinks that what those operators want is a bad idea, >>> those operators will not get what they request/pay for from their suppliers. >> To be fair, those operators also tell us that they use protocols that >> are not IETF protocols and it remains somewhat unclear what those >> protocols are we are expected to optimize data model solutions for. >> >> /js >> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
