Hi, Noticed other issue with example set, In https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang/issues/194 Lada stated that in YANG 1.0 submodule can not augment nodes defined in parent model.
Is that correct that submodule can not augment definition defined in parent module? Is such definition also augmentation. ________________________________________ Od: Ladislav Lhotka <lho...@nic.cz> Odoslané: 29. februára 2016 17:36 Komu: Peter Verthez Kópia: netmod@ietf.org Predmet: Re: [netmod] Augment issue Hi Peter, I agree it should be OK. I tried to reproduce the situation and test it with pyang and it led to a Python exception. So I filed an issue: https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang/issues/206 Lada > On 29 Feb 2016, at 10:09, Peter Verthez <peter.vert...@nokia.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago I reported a bug on the OpenDaylight YANG parser, regarding a > error that was generated on a particular augment construction. The bug > report is the following: > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5335 > > We are disagreeing on the interpretation of the YANG RFC regarding to this > bug, so could we get the opinion of the people on this mailing list on it? > > The problem originated from a proposed Broadband Forum model, but there's a > dummy model that reproduces the problem attached to that bug report. > > Thanks, > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod AntonTkáčik Chief Software Architect Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia +421 911 309 249 / anton.tka...@pantheon.tech reception: +421 2 206 65 111 / www.pantheon.sk [logo] _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
