On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15:28AM +0000, tom p. wrote: > Lada, Robert > > The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D > already says > > " Using the "type" statement, a type is specified for the annotation > value according to the same rules as for YANG "leaf" type. " > > while rfc6020bis says > > " The "leaf" statement is used to define a scalar variable of a > particular built-in or derived type." > > so if you know your YANG off by heart, then you will know that > annotations must be scalar. I agree that the text needs to be clearer. > Perhaps, > OLD > " o annotations are scalar values and cannot be further structured;" > NEW > "Annotations obey the same rules as for a YANG "leaf" type [rfc6020bis > s.7.6] and so are limited to scalar variables."
There is no 'leaf type' in YANG. YANG has leaf nodes in the schema tree. An annotation is not a node in the schema tree. Perhaps something like this: An annotation carries a single value. The type substatement, which must be present, takes as an argument the name of an existing built-in or derived type and the value of the annotation must match this type. See Section 7.4 of [RFC6020bis] for details. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod