On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:11 AM, t.petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:
> Given > > container... list... action > > with the usual twiddly brackets, and a separate mandatory data node > alongside the list in the top level container, is there a requirement to > include that mandatory data node in the XML RPC? > > 6020bis s.7.15.2 says > > " The "action" element contains an hierarchy of nodes that identifies > the node in the datastore. It MUST contain all containers and list > nodes from the top level down to the list or container containing the > action. " > > which suggests, without quite clearly telling me, that it is only the > nodes in the direct path from the top level that have to be included, > not any off to one side in the tree. > > If that is correct, I suggest > > OLD > "It MUST contain all containers and list > nodes from the top level down to the list or container containing the > action. " > NEW > " It MUST contain all containers and list > nodes in the direct path from the top level down to the list or > container containing the action (node). " > > The more precise term in YANG Xpath would be "ancestor data nodes" > Tom Petch > > Andy > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
