My mistake, I simply copied that text from the referenced email without thinking about changing that text. It would’ve helped if the template I used replaced “WG Last Call” with “WG <Last Call|Adoption>”.
Lou, have you posted the template anywhere yet? Thanks, Kent On 3/16/16, 3:37 PM, "Martin Bjorklund" <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: >I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. > >[BTW, you should change the text from "preparation for WG Last Call" >to "preparation for WG adoption" or something.] > > >/martin > > >Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote: >> [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html] >> >> >> Authors, Contributors, WG, >> >> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that >> applies to draft identified above? Please state either: >> >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >> or >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, >> please state either: >> >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >> or >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >> >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >> appropriate. >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware >> of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until >> a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: >> THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE’S TO LINES. >> >> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as >> an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF >> IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any >> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >> information, please see the RFCs listed above and >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. >> >> Thank you, >> NETMOD WG Chairs >> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. >> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod