My mistake, I simply copied that text from the referenced email without 
thinking about changing that text.  It would’ve helped if the template I used 
replaced “WG Last Call” with “WG <Last Call|Adoption>”.  

Lou, have you posted the template anywhere yet?

Thanks,
Kent






On 3/16/16, 3:37 PM, "Martin Bjorklund" <m...@tail-f.com> wrote:

>I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
>
>[BTW, you should change the text from "preparation for WG Last Call"
>to "preparation for WG adoption" or something.]
>
>
>/martin
>
>
>Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote:
>> [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html]
>> 
>> 
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> 
>> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that 
>> applies to draft identified above?  Please state either:
>> 
>>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> 
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?  If yes to the above, 
>> please state either:
>> 
>>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> 
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the 
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware 
>> of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until 
>> a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: 
>> THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE’S TO LINES.
>> 
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as 
>> an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF 
>> IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of 
>> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any 
>> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more 
>> information, please see the RFCs listed above and 
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>> 
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
>> 
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to