Hi - Works for me after fixing the English. The deficiency is IMO serious, but inherent to the netmod architecture, so attempted fixes do not belong in this document.
Randy >From: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> >Sent: Mar 24, 2016 4:42 AM >To: Randy Presuhn <randy_pres...@mindspring.com> >Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org> >Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on >draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT) > > >All, > >I believe that this thread's issue is resolved if the following text is added >to the Security Considerations section: > > >"This document defines a JSON encoding for YANG-defined data. It does not >defined any mechanisms for signing or encrypting said data. Use of an >external mechanism, such as PKCS #7 [RFC2315] or JOSE [RFC7515 and RFC7516], >is needed for such cases." > >Elliot, Randy, Stephen? > >Kent // document shepherd > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
