Re: [netmod] update on "rdns" URN for enterprise YANG models

[Kent Watsen]

On 4/20/16, 7:47 AM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" 
<netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> 
wrote:

>On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:37:03PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>
> 
>> But I like urn:yang:<module-name> even more - and if we had this, we
>> wouldn't have to use the "namespace" statement.  Unfortunately that
>> would require a new version of YANG...
>
>I think we should try to move into a direction that makes things
>simpler and more consistent in the longer term. It is too late to
>address this in YANG 1.1 but clearly if I would have had this idea
>earlier I would have filed an issue. 


Just filed one for YANG-next: https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/5.

Kent



_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod