Jason,

With regards to adding log-input-transports: please see RFC 5424 – The Syslog 
Protocol, sections 3 and 4 where relay and collector functions are discussed. 
In order to support the relay and/or collector function, log-input-transports 
is required and I believe it is best to support the entire RFC 5424 protocol.

I produced the following table to help with the analysis of what features might 
be included. Please provide updates to the table to help with the analysis.

        Feature             Alcatel  Brocade  Ciena  Cisco IOS/XE  Cisco IOS/XR 
 Cisco NXOS  Juniper JunOS  Linux Rsyslog  Comments
log-input-transports                                                            
                                  x
log-action console             x        x                 x              x      
     x            x               x     
log-action buffer              x                          x              x
log-action file                x                          x              x      
     x            x               x
log-action remote                       x       x         x              x      
     x            x               x
log-action terminal                                       x              x      
     x                            x
log-action session             x                                                
                  x
feature buffer-limit-bytes       ?                          x              x
feature file-limit-size                                   x              x      
                  x
feature file-limit-duration                               x                     
                  x
feature 
 terminal-facility-device-logging
feature 
 session-facility-user-logging x                                                
                  x
feature select-sev-compare     x                          x                     
                                  x
feature select-match           x                          x                     
                  x               x
feature structured-data                                                         
                  x               x     Required because of RFC 5424
feature signed-messages                                                         
                                  x     Required because of RFC 5848
                                                                        
Alcatel - 
https://infoproducts.alcatel-lucent.com/cgi-bin/dbaccessfilename.cgi/9300710702_V1_7750%20SR%20(SERVICE%20ROUTER).pdf
Ciena - https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/files/epfiles/st_vid10460-st.pdf
Cisco IOS/XE - 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/esm/command/esm-cr-book/esm-cr-a1.html
Cisco IOS/XR - 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/system_monitoring/command/reference/b-sysmon-cr-asr9k/b-sysmon-cr-asr9k_chapter_0100.html
Cisco NXOS - 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus7000/sw/system-management/command/reference/n7k_sm_cmd_ref/sm_cmd_l.html#pgfId-1014686
Brocade - 
http://www.brocade.com/content/html/en/command-reference-guide/nos-700-commandref/GUID-2297E4CA-76DC-43E5-9164-AC1AC9D3F4E7.html
Juniper JunOS - 
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/configuration-statement/syslog-edit-system.htm;
Linux Rsyslog - http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/                           
                                        

Thanks,

Clyde


On 5/27/16, 12:30 PM, "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA)" <jason.ste...@nokia.com> 
wrote:

>Hi Clyde,
>
>I was a bit surprised to see the receiver/server side config in here 
>(log-input-transports).  That seems to be a somewhat significant change in 
>scope.  I thought the focus of this was more on the generation & distribution. 
> Do many implementations have functionality that maps to this 
>log-input-transports ?   In any case the pyang tree has log-input-transports 
>but it doesn't seem to be down in the actual model itself.  But I'd be 
>inclined to just remove this from the model.  Maybe Mahesh has some thoughts 
>here (I didn't see a posting about this in the mailing list).
>
>I agree there are multiple implementations of console, buffer and session 
>logs.  But maybe 'terminal' should be removed or an if-feature ?  I'm not sure 
>that one is so widespread (not in JUNOS, not in SR OS).
>
>Buffer-limit-messages and having multiple log buffers are both supported by 
>Nokia SR OS. I would think that both of those would have support in other 
>logging implementations as well.  I'm not sure if Tom P. was really concluding 
>that there are no implementations of these in his email.  Do we have multiple 
>examples of implementations that limit log buffers using bytes ?
>
>Buffer-limit-messages would be easy to do as an augmentation but making the 
>log-buffer a list is probably something we should just do from the start.  
>That is also consistent with all the other types of actions (except console of 
>course). The use case for multiple log buffers is that you might sort/filter 
>different types of log events into different circular buffers (i.e. have one 
>for really critical log events, etc) for viewing on the node.
>
>Regards,
>Jason
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of EXT Clyde Wildes 
>(cwildes)
>Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 17:23
>To: netmod@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt
>
>Hi,
>
>This update to the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08 incorporates the changes 
>listed below based on feedback received.
>
>An additional revision to this draft will be necessary to finalize TLS 
>configuration leaves once the ietf-tls-client-server-model that the NETCONF WG 
>plans to spin out of the netconf-server-model draft is available.
>
>Changes from feedback from Mahesh J:
>- added support for configuring a syslog server
>
>Changes from feedback from Tom P.:
>- removed four features for log action leaves console, buffer, terminal and 
>session since they are implemented by multiple vendors. Lack of support for 
>these actions can be indicated using a deviation.
>- removed feature buffer-limit-messages since implementation by any vendor is 
>unknown
>- renamed feature terminal-facility-user-logging-config to 
>terminal-facility-device-logging to shorten the name and to clarify
>- renamed feature session-facility-user-logging-config to 
>session-facility-user-logging to shorten the name
>- renamed feature selector-sevop-config to feature select-sev-compare to 
>shorten the name
>- renamed feature selector-match-config to feature select-match to shorten the 
>name
>- renamed feature structured-data-config to feature structured-data to shorten 
>the name
>- renamed feature signed-messages-config to feature signed-messages to shorten 
>the name
>- removed the log-buffer list and name from log-action buffer since 
>implementation by any vendor is unknown
>- removed the word draft from section 1
>- updated the copyright dates and the revision dates in the models
>- moved the example to an Appendix
>- removed e-mail addresses from the acknowledgement section
>
>Changes from feedback from Benoit:
>- rename module vendor-syslog-types to module vendor-syslog-types-example
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Kiran and Clyde
>
>
>
>
>On 5/10/16, 2:14 PM, "netmod on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" 
><netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>>directories.
>>This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF.
>>
>>        Title           : SYSLOG YANG Model
>>        Authors         : Clyde Wildes
>>                          Kiran Koushik
>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt
>>      Pages           : 35
>>      Date            : 2016-05-10
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   This document describes a data model for the Syslog protocol which is
>>   used to convey event notification messages.
>>
>>
>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model/
>>
>>There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08
>>
>>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08
>>
>>
>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
>>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
>>tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>netmod mailing list
>>netmod@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to