Balazs Lengyel <balazs.leng...@ericsson.com> writes:
[edited]
> container myThing {
> leaf enabled { type boolean;}
> action start {
> input {
> // optional so I can just ignore it
> leaf dummy-leaf-never-use-it { type empty; }
> must "../enabled = 'true'";
> }
>
> My question is why do I need to do this ugly solution? Is there a better
> way?
> Is there a reason why I really need the dummy leaf?
> Is there a reason why the rfc does not allow an input field with a
> single must statement in it?
I suspect that is because nobody envisioned that an input statement with
only a 'must' could be useful. You've provided a counterexample to that
idea.
Dale
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
