> On 17 Nov 2016, at 17:03, Phil Shafer <p...@juniper.net> wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka writes: >> So let's say we have a list with min-elements = 1 (such as the list of >> RIBs), and there >> is already one entry provided by the system. what has to be done in order to >> make <inten >> ded> valid? Should the system-controlled entry permeate up to <intended>? > > We should update the draft to make it clear to allow system-controlled > data to appear as part of the template/expansion activity so that > such data can be referred to from the running config. For example, > a static route could have a next-hop of a system-defined lo0. Not > that this is a good idea, but...
I agree, this is often needed for system-controlled instances (default RIB is another use case), and so far the only option was to put a dummy entry into the configuration manually. Lada > > Thanks, > Phil -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
