> On Nov 13, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Dean Bogdanovic <ivand...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Adrian, > > Sorry for not replying earlier. Your email fell through the cracks. > >> On Sep 21, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Adrian Pan <adrian....@ericsson.com >> <mailto:adrian....@ericsson.com>> wrote: >> >> I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 and I am considering to >> implement the data model in the draft, while I found below issue: >> - Operator is able to configure the matches of ace different from the >> acl-type, i.e ace configured with ipv6 matches while the “acl-type” is >> configured as ipv4 in the acl, this is not aligned with the model design >> intention. > > The acl-type provides implicit specification of the match criteria. Authors > wanted to enable support for mixed type acl (example mac and ip) in the same > list. And let the vendors determine based on their platform and what is > supported how to implement the model.
I do not understand “implicit specification of the match criteria". Say the acl-type is specified as ipv6, and the user configures a ipv4 address in the ACL, how does it help the platform? I agree with Adrian that a more intuitive use of the acl-type would be to check whether the address being configured matches the type and reject the configuration if it does not. > > Dean > >> >> Thanks >> Adrian >> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org >> <mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen >> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:46 AM >> To: netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 (until Oct >> 5, 2016) >> >> >> This is a notice to start a two-week NETMOD WG last call for the document: >> >> Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08> >> >> Please indicate your support or concerns by Wednesday, October 5, 2016. >> >> We are particularly interested in statements of the form: >> * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 and found no issues. >> * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 and found the following >> issues: ... >> >> As well as: >> * I have implemented the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08. >> * I am implementing the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08. >> * I am considering to implement the data model in >> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08. >> * I am not considering to implement the data model in >> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08. >> >> Thank you, >> NETMOD WG Chairs >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
