Hi Rob,
> Hi Kent, Lou, > > I think that it might possibly be a good idea to please align the > timelines for: > > draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang > draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-yang > > because I think that it will be somewhat helpful to review both > documents together. Can you provide dates you think we can commit to? > Also, I just wanted to confirm that the datastore work is covered by > this text: > > c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are used. > This effort entails describing the context that network management > protocols (e.g., NETCONF, RESTCONF, CoAP, etc.) operate in, and > how certain YANG statements interact in that context. Yes indeed, or at least, that was the intention. Here "conceptual framework" and "context" are meant to be more all-encompassing than just the datastores effort. Makes sense, or needs clarification? Thanks, Kent // co-chair _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
