Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> writes: > On 5/17/2017 3:46 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> Also open issue B.3 says design time mounts are not supported yet but >>> sec 1 (Intro) says they are out of scope: >>> >>> The schema mount mechanism defined in this document provides support >>> only for the latter two cases because design-time definition of the >>> mounted schema doesn't play well with the existing YANG modularity >>> mechanisms. For example, it would be impossible to augment the >>> mounted data model. >>> >>> >>> I agree with sec 1. Leave them out of scope. >> I also agree. This is open until we have WG consensus. > > (As contributor) > I'm fine with leaving such support out of scope for this document, but > disagree with the text. How about just keeping it simple and say: > > The schema mount mechanism defined in this document provides support > only for the latter two cases, i.e., design-time mounts are not > specified by this document.
I used this wording, is it OK? The schema mount mechanism defined in this document provides support only for the latter two cases. Design-time mounts are outside the scope of this document, and could be possibly dealt with in a future revision of the YANG data modeling language. Lada > > Lou > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
