My opinion is absolutely not. Past attempts to mix forwarding and routing policy have been, at best, very confusing. This issue should be removed from section 8 and closed.
Thanks, Acee From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, July 7, 2017 at 5:03 PM To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> Subject: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-11 issue #4 Created issue #4 in github<https://github.com/netmod-wg/acl-model/issues/4> as "Should this model include route-policy definition as defined in draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model?” with the following description: The title says it all. The only note is that the draft in question has expired, so it is not clear what the status of those definitions are. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
