On 9/15/17 09:21, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote: > >> Now, if you are already a YANG expert, I guess you don't use the >> tree output much. > > I think this has nothing to do with YANG experience. The intention of > the tree format was to provide a concise overview of the structure of > the schema tree. If we start to include type specifics that can get > very detailed, the diagrams loose their value.
I agree that clutter is bad. I had the same reservation, but I am also working with models and sharing information with people where a tree that has a _bit_ more information would be useful. I agree that showing this by default will be messy in some cases. And maybe this has moved to a question more for you, Martin, in pyang's GitHub channel. But if this output were put behind an option, would you entertain a PR? Joe _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
