Dear all,
Currently sitting in the rtgwg WG.
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip are currently in
AD review.
Let's look at the datatracker new YANG-related URLs to understand the
impact analysis (the dependent YANG modules) for these two drafts:
*
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-v...@2017-10-25.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both
*
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-...@2017-10-25.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both
So the bottlenecks for standardization are:
* draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp:
o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip
* draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip:
o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip
o RFC8022bis: ietf-routing
o draft-ietf-ospf-yang: ietf-ospf (draft status: still ID-exists)
o draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg: ietf-isis (draft status: still
ID-exists)
So the ask to close on RFC7223bis, RFC7277bis, and RFC8022bis asap.
I understand the LC will start soon for these drafts.
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
