Thanks. This suggestion seems cleanest. Can the tree diagrams draft be updated to describe this?
BR, Ian > On 21. Dec 2017, at 11:43, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:39:47AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> But this is in the YANG source; I think Ian asked about the tree >> diagram syntax. Maybe the corresponding syntax in the tree diagram >> could be simply: >> >> augment /nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance >> /nat:mapping-table/nat:mapping-entry: > > Works for me. > >> Or even simpler, maybe we can say that any string in the tree diagram >> syntax can follow the YANG string rules. > > The YANG string rules are for machines to get the parsing right. Since > the tree diagrams are for humans, the less noise the better. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
