Igor Bryskin <igor.brys...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question for the authors.
> Today a yang-tree-diagram represents extended YANG groupings , which
> often makes a tree hard to read/ understand. Do you think there could
> be a way to represent groupings as collapsed?
In draft -03, we added the option of printing the "uses statement",
e.g.:
| +---x active-route
| | +--ro output
| | +--ro route
| | +--ro next-hop
| | | +---u next-hop-state-content
| | +---u route-metadata
instead of:
| +---x active-route
| | +--ro output
| | +--ro route
| | +--ro next-hop
| | | +--ro (next-hop-options)
| | | +--:(simple-next-hop)
| | | | +--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| | | +--:(special-next-hop)
| | | | +--ro special-next-hop? enumeration
| | | +--:(next-hop-list)
| | | +--ro next-hop-list
| | | +--ro next-hop*
| | | +--ro outgoing-interface?
if:interface-ref
| | +--ro source-protocol identityref
| | +--ro active? empty
| | +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
/martin
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
> From:Lou Berger
> To:joel
> jaeggli,draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagr...@ietf.org,netmod@ietf.org,
> Date:2017-12-21 16:07:58
> Subject:Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR
> verfication request
>
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
>
> Lou
> (co-author)
>
> On 12/19/2017 1:39 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> >
> > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> >
> > Please state either:
> >
> > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > or
> > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> >
> > If yes to the above, please state either:
> >
> > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > or
> > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >
> > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> > appropriate.
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> > the
> > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> > contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> > TO LINES.
> >
> > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
> > listed
> > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed
> > above
> > and
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > NetMod WG Chairs
> >
> > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> > response.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
