On 1/16/2018 10:22 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
I think
it is incumbent upon those revisiting past/closed WG decisions (in
this case, inline schema being represented by YL) to argue why the
decision needs to be revisited.
I'm repeating my self: b/c the current solution doesn't work well with
the NMDA.
We can try to update the draft and the examples, it should then be much more
clear. It is really very little extra work.
Lada
Lada,
Understanding impact of your proposal on the following would be
quite helpful:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/ (pub requested)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/ (pub requested)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-l3vpn-yang/
Lou
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
