On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:43:18AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Alexander Clemm <alexander.cl...@huawei.com> wrote: > > +1 to (2) as preference, followed by (1). I don't think (3) is needed > > here. The purpose is to make this human-readable and provide readers > > a good sense of the overall structure. The authoritative > > specification is still the .yang itself. Providing some guidance for > > how to represent the tree is good but let's not over-engineer this; I > > believe retaining some flexibility is good. > > The last sentence summarizes my personal view. I prefer (1), followed > by (2).
+1 /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
