"Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <bart.boga...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > During implementation we came across the following anomaly: > > According to RFC 6933 entPhysicalParentRelPos the value should be > set to -1 in case there is no parent. > The hardware YANG model defines this leaf as int32 with range "0 > .. 2147483647", To be in-line with the referred RFC, shouldn't the > range be extended as "-1 .. 2147483647"?
In MIBs, people often use special values to indicate that the underlying thing doesn't exist. In YANG we try to avoid this, and instead not instantiate the node. This should probably have been clarified in the YANG module. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
