Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron, A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published that addresses your concerns.
Thanks, Clyde On 2/20/18, 9:06 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of kwat...@juniper.net> wrote: > Kent > > You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to. > > The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams > should be an Informative Reference. > > Therefore, the RFC Editor will not hold publication until an RFC number > is assigned. > > Therefore, a note asking the I-D reference to be updated to reflect the > assigned RFC number is null - the RFC can be published with the > reference as an i-d and not as an RFC which is what I expect the RFC > Editor to do. > > QED Except I know that this draft will be stuck in MISREF state and tree-diagrams will in fact be assigned an RFC number by the time this draft is published. K. > Note that this is not the case of a Normative i-d reference being buried > in the YANG module and not being.noticed by the RFC Editor; that problem > I am content with. > > >Tom Petch > > Please also address these issues when posting -21 to address Benoit's issues. Please post -21 ASAP as Benoit has already placed this draft on the IESG telechat in a couple weeks. > > Thanks, > Kent // shepherd > > > On 2/14/18, 8:18 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of bcla...@cisco.com<mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > Dear all, > > - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned. > Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro > > The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management > > Datastore Architecture defined in I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. > > > - As mentioned in the writeup, [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] should be an informative reference, not normative. > > - Editorial: > OLD: > This draft addresses the common leafs > NEW: > This document addresses the common leafs > > Please publish a new version asap. > In the mean time, I'm sending this draft to IETF LC. > > Regards, Benoit > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cJ7MVnQVc1hgxpVF7oYiVn6Rbm-Qf2dDyrfYhL-s9io&s=u0Hn9GkO-B0jUGm1MnIQ4x4AgIZNXHBIaZhTPmt3dC8&e= > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod