Hi Lada,
On 16/07/2018 08:35, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Robert Wilton <rwilton=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> writes:
Hi Kent,
I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
statement, although an equivalent solution would be refine it with an
if-feature statement for a feature that is never enabled.
Neither "when" nor "if-feature" is permitted as a substatement of
"refine".
My reading of 7950, is that you are allowed to refine a node to add an
"if-feature".
RFC 7950, section 7.13.2:
The following refinements can be done:
....
o A leaf, leaf-list, list, container, choice, case, anydata, or
anyxml node may get additional "if-feature" expressions.
Thanks,
Rob
Lada
Ideally, I think that the groupings would be split up, so that they
build on each other.
grouping "foo" {
container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
}
grouping "bar-etc" {
container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
... // the "etc" ;)
}
grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
grouping "foo";
grouping "bar-etc";
}
Thanks,
Rob
On 11/07/2018 18:30, Kent Watsen wrote:
Say there is:
grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
... // the "etc" ;)
}
And the goal is to use the grouping sans the "foo" node.
Can a "when" statement that always evaluates to "false"
do it?
grouping "bar-etc" {
uses "foo-bar-etc" {
refine "listen" {
when "false()";
}
}
}
Any better ideas?
Thanks,
Kent
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
