> So do we hit a requirement (which is independent of versioning) that a > mechanism is needed to select different module sets (or views), given > that the reality gives us overlapping and competing models? And then > as a side effect, such a mechanism may also be used to select between > different versions? Sounds compelling. Reminds me of Andy's packages idea. I'd like to see the next level of analysis on this idea. Kent // contributor _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility require... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility req... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility... Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility requirements in ... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility requirement... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility require... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility req... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] backward compatibility... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] backward compatib... Kent Watsen