Suresh Krishnan <sur...@kaloom.com> wrote: > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 3.3. > > I think it would be nice to have some examples to illustrate the differences > between inline and shared-schema and some guidance to pick between the two.
Some examples and a bit of reasoning is provided in A.2 and A.3. Maybe add a reference in 3.3: Examples of "inline" and "shared-schema" can be found in Appendix A.2 and Appendix A.3, respectively. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
