Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > one quick comment; the header used in the examples in > > section 8 isn't equal to the header defined in section 5.1 > > > This is intentional. Section 5.1 says: > > The first line is the following 46-character string that MAY be > surrounded by any number of printable characters.
Ok. > The rationalization here is: > > - scripts can easily center the text with equal amounts of some > chosen character. The script in the Appendix, which was used > to fold examples 8.1 thru 8.4, uses '=' characters. > > - manual folding is difficult to center, and hence other framing > is more suitable. For instance, the example in Section 8.5. Ok, but what's the point? Why not use a fixed header? IMO it might also improve readability by have a common well-known header. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
