Hello,

We do see a need for the following types:

  • date (in the earlier debate as I remember Martin wanted to include timezone)
  • time
  • node-instance-identifier from netconf-acm. We found that this is a useful type used not just in acm, so it would be nice to have it defined in 6991.
  • email

regards Balazs

On 2018. 10. 31. 13:46, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
Here is my list of possible additions. I might have lost some items on
a computer that meanwhile is not used anymore, I will have to dig a
bit to see what I can recover.

/js

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:26:01PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Hi,

another update that was discussed recently is a clarification of the
XPath context for the xpath1.0 type.

Lada

Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> writes:

NETMOD WG,

A conversation in NETCONF WG regarding the yang-push noted that it might be 
time to update RFC 6991, in particular to introduce a type for time-duration.

  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/KaUJloIShkLNIXTuHZNwB-SYBnQ

In addition, it might be good to introduce [inet?] types for RFC 5322 
(Internet Message Format) including perhaps:

  - email-address        (addr-spec, per Section 3.4.1)
  - named-email-address  (name-addr, per Section 3.4)


Kent // contributor



_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

      
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
-- 
Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
Senior Specialist
Mobile: +36-70-330-7909              email: balazs.leng...@ericsson.com 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to