Hi,
>> While I agree with Martin, in our systems we have a number of places, where 
>> the system does create configuration in running, due to
>> 
>> different levels of automation and autonomous algorithms kick-in
>> the created config needs to be possible to be further modified by the 
>> operator
>> the created config needs to be referenced from operator created config
>> the created config is not always ephemeral, it might need to be part of 
>> backup/restore
> This is only a sampling from "the list of excuses". I have heard many more. 
> The road to hell is paved with good intentions, however. If we want to build 
> automation based on sound theory, clearly separating the orders from managers 
> from a system's own operational view is key, IMO. Reliability, security, 
> accountability are growing in importance, and they all play in this direction.
> 
> We may not need to standardize rules to outlaw the above; the market will 
> take care of that. What we need to ensure is that it is possible to be 
> standards compliant without having to implement design excuses like these.
> 
> 
> NMDA has a lot of room for proprietary mechanisms for converting <running> to 
> <intended>.
> Many times the features desired by engineers exceed the capabilities of YANG, 
> such as
> a dynamic default leaf.  YANG allows a simple constant, and no business logic 
> to pick the default.
> This is a very valid use of "server auto-magic".
> 
> Maybe a future version of YANG can improve the client visibility into this 
> "auto-magic"

As you say, this is not uncommon. I usually recommend to leave out any default 
statement, and write in the description what happens if this leaf isn't set. 
The operator can then override the default by giving a value. 

While some more advanced features for default values may be of some utility, 
the simplicity of YANG is also important. We don't want to make the YANG models 
-- the interface contracts -- the new place for all business logic.

/jan

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to