On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:43:05AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
2001:db8::/64 and 2001:db8::1/64 are NOT the same if you use them.
Why are they not the same if you define a prefix?
Because they're not. One of them is a valid prefix, the other one isn't.
+17.4 is not an integer, so this is an error (not because of the + but
because of the . followed by additional digits). +17 is I think a valid
integer value but the + will be dropped in the canonical representation.
Yes, but 2001:db8::1/64 isn't valid prefix (because the host portion of
the prefix isn't 0) so why should it be "rounded" when 17.4 shouldn't be
rounded if an integer input is expected?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
