So this was a very thin response on a WG adoption call on the mailing list, but given the sense of the room on Tuesday, I think we can accept this as a WG draft. We do have the WG last call as another formal opportunity to stop this if it turns out this can be done in a way that preserves full compatibility with RFC 8525.
We are now waiting for a final WGLC-ready I-D version of yang-cbor (one internal author review is outstanding), and then will WGLC the whole cluster (yang-cbor, sid, comi, core-yang-library) in the CoRE WG with a CC to the CCs of this mail. This WGLC will not go through without a number of high-quality reviews. Grüße, Carsten > On Jul 11, 2019, at 09:44, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > > RFC 8525 defines a YANG data model for information about the YANG modules, > datastores, and datastore schemas used by a network management server. This > data model is based on string representations of YANG identifiers. > > To be more useful in a constrained environment (CoRECONF/COMI), it is useful > to have a YANG data model that can employ the efficiency of SIDs > (draft-ietf-core-sid). draft-veillette-core-yang-library-05.txt provides a > straightforward translation of RFC 8525 to SID-based identification, with > some legacy support removed and some other efficiencies added. This > specification complements the three other CoRECONF specifications > draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor, draft-ietf-core-sid, and draft-ietf-core-comi, > which we hope to ship soon. > > This starts a one-week working group adoption call. > This is a formal call for adoption of this draft as a WG document of the CoRE > WG. > If you have read the draft and support adopting it, please say so. > If you see a problem with adopting it as a WG document, please tell us. > For both, remember that WG adoption does not mean that we already have > consensus on all the details(*), just that this is the right working document > to address the issue (and that we should address the issue in the first > place); you are encouraged to mention any issues that you already know. > > This WGA call is CCed to the netconf and netmod working groups, as the > expertise about YANG modules is focused there, as well as the yang-of-things > non-WG mailing list. Please respond to c...@ietf.org, or exceptionally to > core-cha...@ietf.org (for off-list comments). > > This formal WG adoption call runs until the end of July 18th. > > Grüße, Carsten > > (*) say, is the module-set index really limited to an 8-bit number? > > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
