This errata should be accepted.

Kent


> On Jul 31, 2019, at 10:36 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8407,
> "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data 
> Models".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5800
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: tom Petch <daedu...@btconnect.com>
> 
> Section: appendix b
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       "WG Web:   <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
> .....
>        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
> .....
>        (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Appendix A rightly says that these URL should have a scheme of https:
> but Appendix B wrongly specifies http:
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8407 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents 
> Containing YANG Data Models
> Publication Date    : October 2018
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to