Hi, The YANG looks valid. yangdump-pro reports 1 warning:
Warning: Revision date in the future (2019-10-10) ietf-notification-capabilit...@2019-10-10.yang:90.3: warning(1021): revision date in the future *** /home/andy/Desktop/ietf-notification-capabilit...@2019-10-10.yang *** 0 Errors, 1 Warnings Andy On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:14 PM Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Balasz, > > In general support of unions is poor across the tool sets that I have > used. It does not help that yanglint gives a completely different error. > > I did try yanger, and that did not result in an error. > > The other option is to move the default statement inside the grouping, > which seems to make the error go away. > > Cheers. > > On Oct 9, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Balázs Lengyel < > balazs.lengyel=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hello, > I was trying to validate the attached model. However pyang keeps > complaining about refining a default for a leaf-list: > > ietf-notification-capabilit...@2019-10-10.yang:184: error: "leaf-list" > node "ietf-notification-capabilities::supported-excluded-change-type" > cannot be refined with "default" > > > Why? According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-7.13.2 “A > leaf-list node may get a set of default values ...” > > . > Confdc accepts this. Could this be a bug in pyang ? > Regards Balazs > > -- > Balazs Lengyel Senior Specialist > Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: balazs.leng...@ericsson.com > > <ietf-notification-capabilit...@2019-10-10.yang> > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > > Mahesh Jethanandani > mjethanand...@gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
