Hi, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready with Nits > > Gen-ART Last Call & telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04.txt > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2019-10-20 > IETF LC End Date: TBD > IESG Telechat date: 2019-10-31 > > Summary: Ready with nits > -------- > > Comments: > --------- > > This was accidentally put on the IESG agenda without an IETF Last Call, > so this review serves both purposes. > > The draft seems very clear and I have no technical comments. > > Nits: > ----- > > > Updates: 8340 (if approved) > > Intended status: Standards Track > > RFC 8340 is a BCP, so can this really be Standards Track? > Shouldn't it also be BCP, extending BCP 215? It's tricky, > because it also effectively extends RFC 8040, which is > Standards Track rather than BCP. Sadly it doesn't seem that > a document can be both BCP and Standards Track.
Hmm, the main contribution in this document (the "structure" extension), is not suitable as a BCP. It is really just section 3 that updates 8340. I don't know to to resolve this, and will look at the document shepard for guidance! > Also, this draft says: > > > The "yang-data" extension from [RFC8040] has been copied here, > > renamed to "structure", and updated to be more flexible. > > That reads as if RFC 8040 is also updated, and it leaves the > status of "yang-data" unclear. Is it now deprecated? Perhaps the > sentence would be clearer like this: > > This document defines a new YANG extension statement called > "structure", which is similar to but more flexible than the > "yang-data" extension from [RFC8040]. Thank you, this is better! /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
