There is quite a lot wrong with the admin of the YANG-library I-D when compared with RFC8407 IMHO
Security considerations does not conform to boiler plate IANA considerations does not register name space RFC 6991 is imported and so MUST be a Normative reference ietf-sid-file is imported and so MUST be a Normative not Informative reference for the I-D reference ietf-core-sid would be better as RFC YYYY with an RFC Editor note asking them to replace YYYY with the number assigned to 'YANG Schema ... Organization Netconf WG seems an odd choice and contradicts contact details Contact does not normally specify WG Chairs more than one revision clause CORECONF not an abbreviation I recognise I will look some more as and when these are addressed (or I see IETF Last Call:-) Tom Petch ________________________________________ From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> Sent: 09 March 2020 13:04 To: core Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] π WG Last Call of CORECONF drafts: draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12, -sid-11, -comi-09, -yang-library-01 It took us a long time to get the four CORECONF drafts in sync, but now we are ready for WGLC. This starts a working group last call for β draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12 β draft-ietf-core-sid-11 β draft-ietf-core-comi-09 β draft-ietf-core-yang-library-01 ending on 24:00 UTC on Tuesday, March 31, 2020. (This includes some extra time for the IETF week and for cross-WG coordination.) This WGLC is copied to the netmod WG mailing list; please do have a look at these drafts as they are slated to become a part of the greater YANG/NETCONF/RESTCONF family. We intend the discussion to be on the CoRE mailing list, but if you find a fundamental issue with YANG or RESTCONF, feel free to discuss that on netmod instead. Please start a new email thread for each major issue that will need discussion and make sure the subject line includes the draft name and some sort of name for the issue. (Minor issues such as typos can also be sent to the authors.) If you read the draft and think it looks fine, please send a one line email to the list or to the chairs letting us know that so we can get a feel of how broad the review has been. (To reviewers and authors:) If you are aware of any patent claims that might apply to systems that implement these drafts, please review BCP 78 and BCP 79 and make any appropriate IPR declaration before the last-call ends. If you are not sure whether you need to make a declaration or not, please talk to the chairs and we will help. GrΓΌΓe, Carsten _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod