> Even though we are debating/discussing whether iETF moduels should use YANG > semver (aka modified semver), please note that there is interest from other > publishers of YANG modules to use semver or YANG semver.
Details? > Regarding your comment below, is it specific to IETF modules or more general? > > "I don’t think the “semver" label has been fully justified relative to the > disruption I perceive it may cause.” I was thinking in general. YMMV. Kent // contributor _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
