Hi Kent, On 7/30/20, 4:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of k...@watsen.net> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing to the definitions in draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang. > With that, your request is relatively clear now Looking at draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang, the proposal is a “typedef” that constrains inet:ipv[46]-address so that it can only contain loopback address values. > and the question the WG > needs to answer is whether these types are common enough to warrant being > part of inet-types, i.e., are there any other places where these types > may be useful? I don’t think so, but I’m not a routing person. I wouldn't think that an internal loopback address would be widely used. In fact, I checked our Cisco native models for IOS-XE and there is no such definition. Thanks, Acee > /js K. // contributor _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod