On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 05:06:13PM +0200, Martin Björklund wrote:
>
> I think that any change in an argument string is an editorial change.
>
> For example, compare these two changes:
>
> A1. description "a server.";
> A2. description "A server.";
>
> B1. description "A server.";
> B2. description "A server.";
>
> These are editorial changes, and thus the revision should be changed.
>
> Note however that the following change might look like an editorial
> whitespace change in the argument, but in fact it is not:
>
> C1.
> description
> "A server and
> its data.";
>
> C2.
> description
> "A server and
> its data.";
+1
I agree since whitespace outside YANG strings is insignificant.
Lets raise this to the next level. What about the following?
D1. description "A server.";
D2. description "A server."; // not very descriptive
E1. description "A server."; // not very descriptive
E2. // not very descriptive
description "A server.";
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
