Hi Kent,

Thanks a lot for your reply and for you suggestion on how to improve the example

Let me try to clarify the goal I am trying to achieve, updating the example as 
per your suggestion:

Identities:
  +-- a
  |  +-- a1
  |  +-- a2
  +-- b
     +-- b1
     +-- b2

The YANG code using the identityref statements would become:

leaf reference-1 {
  type identityref {
    base a;
  }
  description
    "Reference to an identity of type A.";
}

leaf reference-2 {
  type identityref {
    base b;
  }
  description
    "Reference to an identity of type B.";
}

My understanding is that:
reference-1 can be any of: “a1”, and “”a2” (but not “a”)
reference-2 can be any of: “b1”, and “”b2” (but not “b”)


At least, according to my understanding of section 7.18.2 of RFC7950 saying 
that an identity is “irreflexive, which means that an identity is not derived 
from itself”.



Am I missing anything here?



If not the number of allowed combinations would be four: (a1, b1), (a1, b2), 
(a2, b1) and (a2, b2).

Coming back to my goal, I would like to encode in YANG a condition that limits 
the number of possible combinations to just (a1, b1) and (a2, b2).

My doubt is about how to define a must statement that will enforce this rule 
while allowing other modules to define new identities that could be used for 
reference-1  and reference-2. For example, another module can define the a3 and 
b3 identities and impose the condition that only the (a3, b3) combination is 
allowed.

My initial thinking was to leverage the multiple bases feature and re-define 
the identities as follow:

Identities:
  +-- a
  |  +-- a1
  |  |  +-- b1
  |  +-- a2
  |     +-- b2
  +-- b
     +-- b1
     +-- b2

Updating, for example, the YANG code as:

identity b1 {
  base b;
  base a1;
  description
    "Identity B1.";
}

In this case, the must expression could be:

leaf reference-2 {
  type identityref {
    base b;
  }
  must 'derived-from(../reference-2, ../reference-1)';
  description
"Reference to an identity of type B.";
}

IMHO, this code would work but my doubt is about the definition of the 
derived-from function in RFC7950:

boolean derived-from(node-set nodes, string identity)

Could the second argument be an XPath to a node of type identityref or should 
it be a string containing the identity value?

In the former case, my goal has been achieved, while in the latter case it 
would not work since the must statement would need to be updated any time a new 
identity of base a or base b is defined …

What do you think?

Thanks, Italo

From: Kent Watsen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: mercoledì 23 settembre 2020 21:48
To: Italo Busi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [netmod] Another question about identityref with multiple base 
statements

Italo,

Your question is difficult to parse because:

  1) the example is long without an easy way to understand it.  For instance:

             Identities:
               +-- base-1
               |  +-- a
               |  +-- a1
               +-- base-2
                  +-- b
                  +-- b1

  2) the derived identities names aren’t logical.  For instance, this would’ve 
been easier to parse:

             Identities:
               +-- base-1
               |  +-- a1
               |  +-- a2
               +-- base-2
                  +-- b1
                  +-- b2

And the following even easier:

             Identities:
               +-- a
               |  +-- a1
               |  +-- a2
               +-- b
                  +-- b1
                  +-- b2

That said, see below:



On Sep 23, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Italo Busi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I have also another question about identityref with multiple base statements.

Let’s consider the following definitions:

identity base-1 {
  description
    "Base identity #1.";
}

identity base-2 {
  description
    "Base identity #2.";
}

identity a {
  base base-1;
  description
    "Identity A.";
}

identity a-1 {
  base base-2;
  base a;
  description
    "Identity A-1.";
}

identity b {
  base base-1;
  description
    "Identity B.";
}

identity b-1 {
  base base-2;
  base b;
  description
    "Identity B-1.";
}

And the following identityrefs:

leaf reference-1 {
  type identityref {
    base base-1;
  }
  description
    "Reference to an identity #1.";
}

leaf reference-2 {
  type identityref {
    base base-2;
  }
  description
    "Reference to an identity #2.";
}

In this case, my understanding is that all the possible pairs (a, a-1), (a, 
b-1), (a-1, a-1), (a-1, b-1), (b, a-1), (b, b-1), (b-1, a-1) and (b-1, b-1) 
would be valid values for reference-1 and reference-2.

Is my understanding correct?

Reference-1 can be any of: "base-1", “a”, and “”a1”
Reference-2 can be any of: “base-2", “b”, and “”b1”

A total of 9 combinations.  You only list 8 and none of them include “base-1” 
or “base-2”, so no, it doesn’t look correct.



Is there a way to restrict the possible values for reference-1 and reference-2 
to a limited subset like (a, a-1) or (b, b-1)?

For example, would this code be valid?

leaf reference-2 {
  type identityref {
    base base-2;
  }
  must 'derived-from(../reference-2, ../reference-1)';
  description
    "Reference to an identity #2.";
}

If not, is there any other option to restrict the possible values for 
reference-1 and reference-2?

“must” expressions can be used.  For instance, the ssh-client-server draft 
includes the line:

          must 'public-key-format = "ct:ssh-public-key-format”'

          note: "public-key-format” is an identity.

I don’t know about your particular goal, but “must” expressions are incredibly 
powerful and likely can achieve what is needed.

K.  // contributor




Thanks, Italo

Italo Busi
Principal Optical Transport Network Research Engineer

<image001.jpg>
____________________________________________________________________

Huawei Technologies Italia S.r.l.
Address: Centro Direzionale Milano 2, Palazzo Verrocchio, 20090 Segrate (MI)
Tel: +39 345 4721946 - Mobile: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

__________________________________________________________________________________
Huawei Technologies Italia S.r.l. is a company registered in Italy at the 
Company Registration Office of Milan, with registered number 04501190963 and 
equity capital €3,000,000 fully paid up, whose registered office is in Milan, 
Via Lorenteggio 240, Tower A, 20147 Milan, Italy. Huawei Technologies Italia 
S.r.l. is 100% owned by Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.A.
CONAI Reg. No. cc 12639454 - A.E.E. Registry No. IT10010000006521 - Batteries 
and Accumulators Registry No. IT12050P00002839.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not 
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and 
delete it! Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIVACY NOTICE: Pursuant to Art. 13 of the General Data Protection Regulation 
2016/679 (GDPR), Huawei Technologies Italia S.r.l. informs you that the 
personal data contained in this email will be collected and treated for the 
acquisition of information preliminary to the conclusion of contracts, for the 
definition of the contractual relationship, as well as for the fulfillment of 
legal requirements related to civil, tax and accounting law or any other legal 
obligation to which Huawei may be subject. Personal data will not be subject to 
disclosure and spread unless otherwise required by law. Huawei will take 
appropriate security measures to protect personal data against loss, misuse 
disclosure or destruction of the information. Personal Data held may be 
transferred to countries outside the European Union, however Huawei Italia has 
put in place appropriate safeguards for the transfer of personal data to third 
countries by adopting the standard data protection clauses of the EU 
Commission. Personal Data are kept for a period necessary for the fulfillment 
of contract obligations unless otherwise required by law. You can exercise your 
rights under Art. 15 and following of the GDPR (i.e. right of access, 
rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, object) by contacting Huawei 
at this email address: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> or through the 
following channel: 
www.huawei.com/en/personal-data-request<http://www.huawei.com/en/personal-data-request>.
 You have also the right to lodge a complaint with the competent supervisory 
authorities. If you need any further information or have any queries on how 
Huawei process your personal data, please send an email to our Data Protection 
Officer at [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.The Data Controller is 
Huawei Technologies Italia S.r.l. with registered office in Milan, Via 
Lorenteggio 240 Tower A, 20147.


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to